Opening Statments

“The opening statement outlines the case it is intended to present. The attorney for plaintiff delivers the first opening statement and the defense follows with the second. A good opening statement should explain what the attorney plans to prove, how it will be proven; mention the burden of proof and applicable law; and present the events (facts) of the case in an orderly, easy to understand manner.” Mock Trial Material from State of Oregon v. Dulsa (2017-18 Season)
An opening statement is not an argument or a discussion of the law, but rather tells the jury what the evidence will show and serves as a road map for the jury to follow. Objections by the opposing counsel are not permitted.
What to know before drafting an opening statement
  - Can you tell a brief story about what happened from your side’s point of view?
 
  - What is your theory of the case?
 
  - What are the key elements that have to be proved (by you or the other side)?
 
  - What do you anticipate the evidence will show?
 
  - What are the important facts your side’s witnesses will testify to?
 
  - What themes (words and phrases that convey emotions) do you want to emphasize?
 
  - Who has the burden of proof and what is it?
 
  - What do you want the jury to do?
 
  - How much time do you have? (usually 5 minutes)
 
Anatomy of an opening: the basics
  - AnIntroduction:
  - Attorney identifiesthemself (or not)
  - A typical introduction:“Your Honor, members of the jury, my name is (full name), representing the prosecution/defendant in this case.”
 
  - If they have already been introduced, some attorneys just go right into their opening to save time, create drama, and make it look more like a real trial.
 
 
  - A theory of the case
  - One or two sentences which tell the jury what your case is about
 
  - “My client, Landry Lopez, was fired for reporting an illegal activity to his employer, the restaurant Buddies Burgers.”
 
 
  - Briefly tell the jury why they are there
  - “This case is brought under Oregon whistle blower law, which prohibits employers for retaliating against employees who have a reasonable belief that an illegal activity has occurred and report it. ”
 
 
 
  - A brief overview (story)of what the evidence will show
  - Presented from your side’sperspective
 
  - Purpose is to give the jury the big picture
 
  - “The facts of this case are straightforward. The evidence will show that on May 5, 2016, Landry Lopez saw . . .”
 
 
  - A brief explanation of what has to be proved
  - “Under Oregon whistle blower law there are three elements that must be proven. First . .”
 
 
  - Identify the witnesses
  - “We will call three witnesses: Landry Lopez, Sam Jackson, a former Buddies Burgers employee, and Tyler Erickson, a journalist student.”
 
 
  - Tell what the key testimony of each witness will be
  - “Mr. Lopez will tell you that . . .”
 
  - “Next, Plaintiff will call Ms. Jackson, a former BB employee . . “.
 
  - “Finally you will the testimony of Tyler Erickson, who was with Mr. Lopez . . . “
 
 
  - A conclusion
  - Discuss the burden of proof (some put this near the beginning)
  - “This is a civil case and Plaintiff Landry Lopez must prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.” (Explain briefly and illustrate with hands what a preponderance of the evidence means)
 
 
  - Restate the theory of the case
  - “Oregon’s whistle blower law exists to protect, and encourage, employees to report illegal activity in the workplace. Mr. Lopez engaged in such whistle blower activity and was fired for doing so. “
 
 
  - Tell the jury what you want
  - “For these reasons, after you have heard all the evidence, at the end of this trial we will ask you to return a verdict in favor of Landry Lopez.”
 
  - “At the end of the trial the State of Oregon will ask you to find the Defendant guilty of . . . . .”
 
  - “Based on the evidence you will hear, at the end of the trial the Defendant will ask you to return a verdict of not guilty
 
 
 
Going Deeper: Ways to Improve the Opening Statement:
  - In a Mock Trial the attorney is judged on:
  - Substance and technique . . . AND
 
  - Performance and style
 
 Substance and Technique 
  - Keep revising your opening until it is exactly as you want it
  - Opening statements go through many edits and revisions
 
  - Seek out the input from others
 
  - Try things out – if they don’t work, don’t use them
 
 
  - Consider a hook in the introduction
  - A hook is a sentence or very short paragraph in the introduction which serves as an attention-grabbing element
 
  - The effectiveness of the hook is defined by its ability to interest and motivate the jury to listen more closely
 
  - The hook should arouse interest but not be argumentative
 
 
  - Tell a good story
  - Story telling is at the heart of a good opening
 
  - A story paints a vivid picture – walk jury through it with each witness
 
  - Use active voice
 
  - Use language that reinforces your themes
 
  - Create interest but don’t tell everything
 
 
  - Do not argue the case
  - The opening statement is not an argument
 
  - Do not argue the facts or law
 
  - Save arguments for closing
 
  - It is OK to state and develop your theory of the case
 
  - Stick with what the facts w ill show a nd what they will not show
 
 
  - Use future tense when talking about what the evidence will show
  - Proper phrasing includes statements like:
 
  - Use a few of these lines but not too many, don’t overdo it
 
 
  - Stay in control of the picture you paint in the jury’s mind
  - Everything you say should have a purpose
 
  - Don’t ask questions during opening statements (it allows the jury to come up with answers you might not want)
 
  - Do not waste your time on unimportant things or go into excessive detail (may make the jurors lose focus)
 
  - Use descriptive emotional content in describing the most important facts
 
 
  - State the facts affirmatively – do not negate the other side’s facts or position
  - The more you repeat something the more it is remembered and believed
 
  - If you say the evidence will show that“Mrs. Smith did not run the red light,”the‘not’is lost.
 
  - The jury remembers the phrase“ran the red light”
 
  - Instead say the evidence will show“Mrs. Smith came to a complete stop at the signal.”
 
  - The jury remembers “came to a complete stop at the signal.”
 
 
  - Personalize your side’s witnesses
  - Use their names
 
  - Depersonalize the opposition’s witnesses with language like‘Defendant”or“Plaintiff”
 
 
  - The Prosecution in a criminal case is the Government
  - Don’t be shy to take on this role
 
  - Refer to yourself“The State of ___”not just the“prosecution.”
 
 
  - Talk about facts that are not in dispute (look at the stipulations)
  - “There are certain facts in this case that are not in dispute . . . “
 
  - “The Defense/Prosecution have agreed . . .”
 
  - “The parties have agreed that . . . “
 
 
Performance and Style 
Body language is a very powerful tool. We had body language before we had speech, and apparently, 80% of what you understand in a conversation is read through the body, not the words. – Deborah Bull, English dancer, writer, and broadcaster
  - Practice, practice, practice
 
  - Find your focus, energy and commitment
 
  - Memorize the Opening Statement
  - Memorize content, movement, inflections, and gestures
 
  - This will maximize the points you will get
 
  - If notes are needed
  - Use them sparingly
 
  - Use a legal pad or clip board so they do not flop around
 
 
 
  - Talk directly to the jury
  - Look them in the eye
 
  - Educate them about the case
 
  - Move closer (5-10 ft.) but not too close
 
  - Be natural to keep their attention
 
 
  - Use conversational language that is engaging
  - Let the type of case dictate your style and tone
  - Example: A prosecutor might want to be more forceful whereas a defendant might want to evoke sympathy
 
 
  - Use legal terminology sparingly
 
 
  - Use body posture and movement deliberately and consciously
  - Maintain upright body posture (do not slouch)
 
  - Keep shoulders back to show confidence
 
  - Stay balanced
 
  - If you move, make the movement coincide with transitions between points
 
  - Try not to change position more than 7 times in 5 minutes
 
  - Try not to fidget or have unnecessary gestures or body movements
 
 
  - Use gestures
  - Use gestures to create interest and drama
 
  - Gestures include the give, the show, the tell, and signposting
 
  - Don’t shy away from pointing to individuals in the court – the type of point may vary
  - If you are the prosecution and point to the defendant it will be using a harder accusatory “tell” gesture with a pointed finger
 
  - If you are pointing to your own witnesses it will be using an inviting open handed “give” gesture
 
 
 
  - Act professional and confident – even if you are nervous